<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How is Linux vulnerable to spyware and phishing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ambience.sk/linux-vulnerable-spyware-and-phishing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ambience.sk/linux-vulnerable-spyware-and-phishing/</link>
	<description>Musings &#38; rants on internet, Slovakia, Linux, SEO, politics (and more) served in English</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 04:47:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rodrigo</title>
		<link>http://www.ambience.sk/linux-vulnerable-spyware-and-phishing/#comment-697</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodrigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 02:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambience.sk/?p=90#comment-697</guid>
		<description>The two are wrong. Nowadays any user is able to use a Linux desktop distro.

Windows IS unsecure itself (much more with the use of Internet Explorer or without Security Packages), it&#039;s a prime need to use an anti-virus, firewall, anti-spyware, etc. and security education; while Linux is 99,999% (to be really fair) secure against malwares, because people work in the OS because of passion, not greed; and there are constant updates to the software, primarily on security efficiency. :)

However, this kind of phishing exposes anyone not aware of the dangers of untrustful applications - and doesn&#039;t matter the OS the victim is using. What matters is intelligence/expertise to see these applications couldn&#039;t be safe. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The two are wrong. Nowadays any user is able to use a Linux desktop distro.</p>
<p>Windows IS unsecure itself (much more with the use of Internet Explorer or without Security Packages), it&#8217;s a prime need to use an anti-virus, firewall, anti-spyware, etc. and security education; while Linux is 99,999% (to be really fair) secure against malwares, because people work in the OS because of passion, not greed; and there are constant updates to the software, primarily on security efficiency. :)</p>
<p>However, this kind of phishing exposes anyone not aware of the dangers of untrustful applications &#8211; and doesn&#8217;t matter the OS the victim is using. What matters is intelligence/expertise to see these applications couldn&#8217;t be safe. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.ambience.sk/linux-vulnerable-spyware-and-phishing/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambience.sk/?p=90#comment-137</guid>
		<description>But Linux users are more educated, usually know some programming languages, so should be able to check the widget code themselves. Otherwise, your argument is correct, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Linux users are more educated, usually know some programming languages, so should be able to check the widget code themselves. Otherwise, your argument is correct, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asti</title>
		<link>http://www.ambience.sk/linux-vulnerable-spyware-and-phishing/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Asti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ambience.sk/?p=90#comment-136</guid>
		<description>RE: PS
But the number of Windows users deadly exceeds Linux base so the time of detection is just a fraction compared to linux
Windows is more secure : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: PS<br />
But the number of Windows users deadly exceeds Linux base so the time of detection is just a fraction compared to linux<br />
Windows is more secure : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

